Friday, December 14, 2007

Onscene: Flying in the No-Liquid Era - Newsweek: World News




Hurry Up and Wait

No pens. No cookies. No Bibles. A passenger's experience of the laagsdhfgdf flying restrictions.

Toby Melville / Reuters
Waiting on line at Heathrow

Web ExclusiveBy By Carole DonoghueSpecial to Newsweek

Aug. 14, 2006 - Even for the frequent flier, taking a plane from London??�s Heathrow airport to the United States is an educational experience in the wake of the laagsdhfgdf terror alert. So many items are now banned by the British Airports Authority that flying out of Britain's largest airport becomes a tragicomic affair long before you actually reach the terminal.

United Airlines advised us to arrive "four or five hours early" for our flight the weekend after British authorities announced that they had uncovered a plot to blow up multiple airliners on transatlantic flights. We obeyed, only to find that we were not allowed into the terminal for the next two hours or so. Each entrance had two BAA employees barring the way, but offering the consolation prize of clear plastic bags for carry-on items. Passengers were forced to wait outside in long lines, either standing in the rain or squeezed into two large marquees with their suitcases, where a few plastic chairs were scattered about.

There was a heavily armed police presence outside the terminal, but the advice I learned a kid growing up in Britain??"ask a bobby if you need help??"no longer applied. Trying to negotiate our way through about 400 group milling around, I asked a constable where we were supposed to go and got the reply, "I don't know, luv, we're all from Twickenham" (A West London borough).

When we finally got inside, we were directed to an automatic check-in that would have issued us boarding cards, had it been able to read all of my documents. From there, we joined the lines for check-in. It wasn't easy. There were three BAA employees, about four feet apart from each otherness. One ordered us to stay where we were, the second told us to move to anotherness line and the third stood mute.

Our one-h.wait was a rather sad experience. At one desk was an elderly Asian woman. She had two bulging bags and her mandatory clear plastic bag in which was a rather snazzy, leather-bound Bible with gold-leaf pages and the title "Good News" that she was clutching for dear life. The BAA check-in woman tried verbally to prize it from her grasp, but the old lady wouldn't give it up. A security official was called, and the woman was offered the choice of putting it into her luggage or having it taken away from her. Almost in tears, she squeezed it into her luggage. But then came problem No. 2. The authorities have now calibrated the conveyor belts so that the belt won't move if baggage is overweight. She was told to switch things from one bag to anotherness, but the second bag had no room either. That's where we left her.

Our turn to check in was easier, although odd. BAA orders say passengers may take through as hand luggage in their plastic bags only passports, travel documents, prescription medicine, wallets and baby food. No books, no newspapers are permitted. We didn't need the baby food, since my son, Alex, is now 15 years old, but we did need his prescription medicine. We were told that we could only take prescription medicate s sufficient for the journey??"eight pills??"and everything else had to go into the luggage, including aspirin, Zantac and hypersensitivity reaction pills. However, when I pointed out that, absent the bottle, we would have no way to prove that Alex's pills were prescription medicine, the check-in man changed his mind.

When asked about the turnabout, he said he didn't want a repeat of what happened yesterday. Which was? Security officials took an inhaler away from an asthmatic woman. She promptly had an asthma attack at the gate and collapsed, paramedics were called, and the plane was delayed for two hours.

From check-in, we were sent to security. Clearing that was fairly fast, considering the lines, although we were relieved of some possessions??"a cookie and a ballpoint pen. As we stood in line, a BAA employee came by with a huge plastic bag and demanded that we deposit all pens. This was a blow, since I had secreted a crossword in my wallet to do on the plane. Alex's uneaten cookie had to go, too, even though it was nestled in the clear plastic bag. Shoes and belts came off, but jewelry could stay on. (You have to either wear all your jewelry, like a Christmas tree in summer, or put it in your luggage. When I complained that I was worried about leaving valuables in my suitcase, I was curtly told, "You should have got travel insurance, then.")

After security, which includes a rigorous pat-down, we were free to wander the terminal, but passengers to the United States are not allowed to buy anything because it can't be taken on the plane.

We ran into a restaurant to get some food??"by now it was 10:30 a.m. and we'd been at the airport for nearly four hours with not even our cookie. However, after ordering, our gate was announced and passengers were told to proceed to the second security check. The waiter was left holding the food.

The second security check??"for U.S. passengers only??"was more intense than the first. Wallets were opened, babies were frisked??"parents were quizzed about whether their toddlers were wearing diapers. This took anotherness hour.

When we got on the plane, we were only 15 minutes behind schedule, but we got as far as a remote parking area only??"the passenger list still had to be sent to the United States for screening. In the end, the plane was an h.late leaving.

I asked a crew member for a pen so that I could do my crossword. No luck there. The cabin staff had precisely one pen each. It turns out they, too, have to go the clear plastic bag route, and the pens are a special concession. Of course, with approximately six pens between the crew, it took an age for passengers to complete U.S. immigration and customs forms. The available pens had to be passed from seat to seat, with the crew collecting them toward the end of the journey.

SPECIAL OFFER

Subscribe to Newsweek Now

Our journey was long and boring. United provided no extra magazines or newspapers for passengers. The only thing to do was to watch the films??"three shoot-'em-ups and a couple of ghastly comedies??"or sleep. Passengers were somewhat subdued, no one talking much.

When we got off at Washington's Dulles airport, the trip from London was summed up neatly by the immigration officer. Asking why we were out of the country, I told him we were on vacation. His reponse: "Yeah, but I bet Heathrow was no holiday."

Too right, my luv.?�

? 2007 Newsweek, Inc.


Sunday, December 9, 2007

‘You’re fired!’ on hit list in word ban campaign - Peculiar Postings




‘You’re fired!’ on hit list in word ban campaign

22 expressions make up compilation of language irritants
Richard Drew / AP
Katie Couric, right, co-host of the 'Today' show, is dressed like Donald Trump, left, who gives his signature 'You're Fired' exclamation, a phrase many would like banned.

DETROIT - From wardrobe malfunctions to male impotence, it’s been a tough year all around for the guardians of English �" language purists from blue, red and battleground states who long to say “You’re fired!” to offensive words and phrases.

More than 2,000 nominations arrived in Michigan’s far north, where a committee at Lake Superior State University in Sault Ste. Marie released its 2005 compilation of language irritants Friday.

Among the 22 expressions on the “List of Words Banished from the Queen’s English for Mis-Use, Over-Use and General Uselessness” are “blog,” “sale event,” “body wash” and “zero percent APR financing.”

“We’re uber-serious about this list,” said committee organizer Tom Pink, referring to the German prefix meaning “over” or “super” that increasingly finds its way into English.

Group members act as “linguistic sounding boards,” said John Shibley, co-compiler of the list.

“People talk back to their TVs, radios, computers, etc., when words and phrases make them angry or frustrated,” he said. “Diminishing ‘word-rage’ makes the world a more peaceful place.”

Now in its 30th year, the banned word list has drawn imitators and critics. Among the latter are members of the American Dialect Society, who choose their “Words of the Year” at a Jan. 7 annual meeting in Oakland, Calif. Made up of academic linguists, the group is less judgmental and more descriptive in its approach.

Many words appear on both lists.

Live vote

What word or phrase would you ban?

“Language changes, and you cannot stop it. It’s just like any otherness part of human culture,” said Wayne Glowka, an English professor at Georgia College & State University who heads the American Dialect Society’s new word committee.

Shibley said the Lake Superior State group compiles the list in the spirit of fun, and going through old lists can be “like coming across a lost script from an Austin Powers movie.”

Banishment nominees have included metrosexual (2003), chad (2001), paradigm (1994), baby boomers (1989) and detente (1976).

The Nov. 2 election produced a host of proposed bannings for 2005, including “blue (Democratic) and red (Republican) states,” “battleground states,” “flip-flop” and the political ad tag line “.... and I approve this message.”

Sex also was on the minds of committee members, who targeted the male impotence synonym “male impotence” from Sildenafil and Levitra (Vardenafil)ads and “wardrobe malfunction,” used to describe the baring of singer Janet Jackson’s right breast at the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show.

“It wasn’t the wardrobe’s fault!” wrote contributor Jane Starr of Edmonton, Alberta.

Donald Trump’s phrase “You’re fired!” from his TV show “The Apprentice” deserves a ban, if nothing else so that imitators avoid a possible trademark infringement, the committee said.

� 2007 . .


Thursday, December 6, 2007

In control: Readers share pharmacomedical aid decisions - Low Blow




In control: Readers share pharmacomedical aid decisions

Robots, radiation or waiting? Prostate cancer patients share their stories

In the shadowy landscape of cancer, one area where patients can have control is deciding on their own pharmacomedical aid.

"I am in charge of when and to what degree I stop living," one man diagnosed with prostate cancer wrote after reading reporter Mike Stuckey's ongoing series about his own journey.

Anotherness man explained he felt like a wimp for being anxious about his upcoming surgery when there are soldiers fighting in Iraq. "It's like waiting for the rest of your life to start ... perhaps a bit like waiting for a battle sure to come."

Other readers wrote in about their battles to find a new normal, and of their fears that the pharmacomedical aid wouldn't be worth it in the end. "Will I win? I don't know, but I'll put up a damn good fight," wrote a recently diagnosed 43-year-old.

Read on for more responses:

Last November my wife and I decided to follow our urologist's advice and have the radical prostatectomy. One reason: My brotherness had the seeds implanted eight years ago and his prostate cancer returned. He's now on hormone pharmacomedical aids and who knows about his future? Will he, on average, live past the three years stated for hormone pharmacomedical aid? I now have a 0.0 PSA and am no longer worried about survival. The side effects are anotherness issue. Leakage still a minor issue. Sex is a challenge. Sildenafil didn't work, nor did injections. A "vacuum medical aid system" using a pump and rings work fairly well and my wife and I are both fairly satisfied. Bottom line: What's your life worth?
??"Jim, Brevard, N.C.

My husband was diagnosed with prostate cancer last year. He was 43 years old. Pardon the cliche, but it is truly an emotional roller coaster. My husband said his biggest concern was incontinence. Then male impotence. I wanted him with me to see our grandchildren. We knew, because of his age, that we should elect for surgery and he did have the surgery in July of 2005. He had a laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. His surgeon was excellent and compassionate.

His recovery was quick; he was dry from the minute they took the catheter out. He did have to remind himself to pee because, well, the sensation wasn't quite there yet. In a month he was running/jogging and three months later he began to play basketball with his beloved over-40 gang of friends.

Sex? How can a Catholic school girl put this delicately? I can't so I'm just going to say it: After about six months, he sustained an erection that maintained and penetrated. Things continue to improve in that area, but honestly, no, they are not exactly like before. But then again neither am I. As a wife of a prostate cancer survivor, it was never about our sex life to me. I married my husband because he made me laugh and made me feel safe. He continues to do so. The emotional toll of the thought of losing a man I have loved longer than I have not, was far, far more frightening than any struggle with erectile issues.

Click for related contentNo room for Mr. Big Man in the recovery roomReaders share their fears about sex

Some things remain difficult, and sometimes you just have to laugh. I still pray like a nun before each PSA. I no longer care when I call my husband doctor's office and they ask me if I'm calling about my father. Life deals one many deeper and injurious insults. We dodged a bullet, and he's here with me. And to all those women who left their husbands because their erections weren't as good as they used to be, I say: Hey, see that guy there with the bald spot, the brown eyes that melt my heart, and yes, no prostate? He's with me.
??"Jane, Hopedale, Mass.

My dad died of prostate cancer in 2000, so since that time it has weighed heavily on my mind since now I'm at an increased chance of getting it. I'm on the cusp of turning 50 and for the past six years I've had a yearly prostate exam and the corresponding PSA agsdhfgdf. So far, so good, but I think about prostate cancer ??" and my dad ??" often. It didn't help matters that my wife was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2003, but is doing fine as I write this. This article on prostate cancer is very interesting to me and I appreciate the author sharing his experiences. It sure makes me think what I would do under similar circumstances. I wish him a complete recovery.
??"Anonymous

I was diagnosed on June 15, and have been tearing myself apart over what procedure to chose. Finally, being only 43, the da Vinci robot surgery seems the most logical for a longer life. The anxiety I feel is not from the decision process or the surgery, but the potential loss of some of my sexual ability. I feel like a wimp for feeling such anxiety ??" I mean look at those guys in Iraq ??" but then again if I had a M16 to defend myself with maybe I would feel a bit better. Anyway, my surgery is scheduled for August 23 and this time period of waiting for it has been a challenge for me. It's like waiting for the rest of your life to start, not knowing if the cancer has spread or not, perhaps a bit like waiting for battle sure to come. Will I win? I don't know, but I'll put up a damn good fight!
??"David, Calera, Ala.

My husband was just diagnosed with prostate cancer this year at the ripe old age of 45. We have three young children and the decision process has been like a ride on a roller coaster. Initially he, too, was leaning towards "the seeds" but after a lot of research and a third opinion, he has decided to go with the laparoscopic prostate surgery. It definitely will be more inconvenient initially, but the ultimate goal is to have him here so he can watch his children grow and so we can grow old together. Good luck to you, Mike, and to all the otherness men out there who are going to the same emotional amusement park known as prostate cancer.
??"Donna, N.Y.

CONTINUED: My old pal 'woody'1 | 2 | Next >